Tag: Legal
-
The CIT Ruling: A Fundamental Invalidation of IEEPA Tariff Authority The Court of International Trade’s decision striking down IEEPA tariffs represents a watershed moment in US trade policy and administrative law. The court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the President authority to impose broad-based tariffs as a trade policy…
-
The February 27 Hard Deadline: When the Court Demands Government Action The United States Court of International Trade has established February 27 as a firm deadline for the Department of Justice to take a definitive position on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) refund litigation. This deadline is not a suggestion or advisory; it…
-
The Constitutional Crisis: States Question Presidential Authority Over Section 122 Tariffs More than 20 US states have filed legal challenges asserting that the Trump administration’s implementation of Section 122 tariffs exceeds constitutional and statutory presidential authority. This coalition lawsuit represents an unprecedented assertion of state power to challenge federal tariff authority and reflects deep concerns…
-
The ACE System Constraint: Why CBP Rejects Protest Claim Submissions CBP’s rejection of Post-Summary Correction (PSC) submissions for IEEPA-affected entries traces directly to Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) system limitations. The ACE system was not configured to accept or process entry submissions that remove IEEPA tariff components from the duty calculation. This is not a policy…
-
The Supreme Court Settled One Question; The CIT Must Answer Others The Supreme Court’s decision on tariff refunds established a foundational principle: importers are owed refunds for duties collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). However, settling the legal principle of refund eligibility does not resolve the practical complexities of execution. The Court…