Tag: IEEPA


  • When to file drawback vs refund (CAPE, protest, PSC). Decision matrix by entry type and import circumstances.

  • Pharma industry tariff strategy. Section 232 pharma effective July 31, branded vs generics, USMCA on Mexican pharma.

  • Corporate Litigation as Market Signal: When Costco Changed Institutional Calculus Costco’s decision to pursue litigation challenging the IEEPA tariffs represented a significant corporate statement. As one of the largest retailers and importers in the United States, Costco’s choice to engage in formal legal challenge to government tariff determinations signaled that major corporations no longer viewed…

  • Tariff Surcharges and Consumer Protection: The Fabletics Lawsuit and Its Implications

    The Fabletics Case: $14.58 in Tariffs and a Significant Legal Question A consumer lawsuit against Fabletics began as a seemingly modest dispute over tariff charges on three purchases totaling $14.58 in tariff costs. On the surface, the dollar amounts are small. However, the legal issues raised in the case are substantial and carry implications extending…

  • The CIT Ruling: A Fundamental Invalidation of IEEPA Tariff Authority The Court of International Trade’s decision striking down IEEPA tariffs represents a watershed moment in US trade policy and administrative law. The court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not grant the President authority to impose broad-based tariffs as a trade policy…

  • Tariff Refund Timing: When Legal Decisions Create Administrative Tsunamis

    The Timeline Paradox: When Delays Serve Strategic Purposes The United States administration’s request for a 90-day delay in IEEPA refund litigation represents a calculated strategy to postpone the administrative burden of processing refund claims. The Supreme Court retains the theoretical authority to conclude the case within 32 days from the current moment, but the government…

  • CIT Deadline Pressure: IEEPA Refund Litigation Enters Critical Phase

    The February 27 Hard Deadline: When the Court Demands Government Action The United States Court of International Trade has established February 27 as a firm deadline for the Department of Justice to take a definitive position on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) refund litigation. This deadline is not a suggestion or advisory; it…

  • States Challenge Trump Tariffs: Legal Questions About Presidential Authority and Constitutional Limits

    The Constitutional Crisis: States Question Presidential Authority Over Section 122 Tariffs More than 20 US states have filed legal challenges asserting that the Trump administration’s implementation of Section 122 tariffs exceeds constitutional and statutory presidential authority. This coalition lawsuit represents an unprecedented assertion of state power to challenge federal tariff authority and reflects deep concerns…

  • Understanding the IEEPA Tariff Refund Process: CAPE System and Timeline for Importers

    IEEPA Tariffs: The Foundation and What Importers Paid The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) grants the President authority to impose tariffs and trade restrictions during periods of national emergency. In recent years, IEEPA has been invoked multiple times to implement tariffs on goods from various countries, affecting billions of dollars in imports and impacting…

  • IEEPA Refund Developments: Detailed Legal Update on Remedial Pathways

    The ACE System Constraint: Why CBP Rejects Protest Claim Submissions CBP’s rejection of Post-Summary Correction (PSC) submissions for IEEPA-affected entries traces directly to Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) system limitations. The ACE system was not configured to accept or process entry submissions that remove IEEPA tariff components from the duty calculation. This is not a policy…